Essays24.com - Term Papers and Free Essays
Search

Homosexuality From A New Perspective

Essay by   •  December 12, 2010  •  1,726 Words (7 Pages)  •  1,174 Views

Essay Preview: Homosexuality From A New Perspective

Report this essay
Page 1 of 7

Homosexuality from a New Perspective

Sexuality means many different things to different people, especially sexuality of a homosexual nature. Everyone has their own personal ideologies about sexuality, many of which have been forced on us by mainstream society's portrayal of what of is right or wrong. Bersani's objective is to take these societal sexual idiosyncrasies and turn them upside down to reveal how he feels gay male sex should be. In Bersani's article, Is the Rectum a Grave?, he entertains ideas of the self, sexuality (especially homosexuality), and power. Bersani believes that abolishing the self opens many options sexually and psychologically. He rejects conventional ideologies pertaining to sexuality like gender, identity and inequality but proposes new ways of thinking about sex and ones sexual identity by showing the reader new and unusual ways of viewing homosexuality and sexuality in general.

In the article, Bersani discusses "the self" and that it should be eradicated. The following is what Bersani thinks of "the self":

It is the self that swells with excitement at the

idea of being on top, the self that makes of the

inevitable play of thrusts and relinquishments in

sex an argument for the natural authority of one sex

over the other.

This quote displays Bersani's thoughts of how one's self controls the way they have been trained to think. The self is formed through a lifetime's worth of experiences, actions, lessons, and just living in the world we live in today. To abolish the self is to abolish an old way of thinking about sex and sexual identities.

Bersani makes it quite clear that he does not believe in unequal homosexual intercourse or any gender's intercourse for that matter. It is a common belief in today's world, whether conscious of it or not that "To be penetrated is to abdicate power." In other words, to be the penetrator (whether it be anally or vaginally according to Bersani) is to have the power, whereas to be the one being penetrated is to be demeaned and have a loss of power. This thirst for power, even though it may be unconscious, is a result of the self wanting control over things that go beyond the self. If one could abolish this way of thinking, one could abdicate all power, resulting in equality in sex.

Another rationale as to why it is important to abolish the concept of "the self" is that it creates sexual identities of people, which then in turn puts limitations on the acceptance of that very identity. When heterosexual people see homosexual people trying to replicate their ideas of gender and sexuality this causes confusion and tension on both sides. Gay machoism is a result of this and according to Bersani, "gay men run the risk of idealizing and feeling inferior to certain representations of masculinity on the basis on which they are in fact judged and condemned. " Why is anyone feeling inferior though? Who said that certain identities belong to either heterosexual or homosexual men? It is the self that is saying that and therefore, ridding one of "the self" rids them of controlling notions of sexual identities.

I also gathered from Bersani's essay that gay male sex defies "the self" because it defies mainstream heterosexual stress of "Why are you having sex with multiple men if you could die because of it?" Gay men are defying "the self" by celebrating their right for pleasure no matter what anyone says about the dangers.

In his essay, Bersani argues against conventional notions of sexuality like gender, inequality, and normative sexual actions. He believes that both "women and gay men spread their legs with an unquenchable appetite for destruction." Bersani says that this because sexual inequality is a problem for both gay men and women because both become the "insertee" during sex and therefore, give up their power. Most people in today's society would think that this is just the way it is. "It's biology", they would say. Bersani however, goes beyond that way of thinking in order to break down that inequality barrier. How he plans to do that will later be explained.

An additional argument Bersani makes against conventional notions of what most people deem "normal" sexual activity is that he celebrates and almost glorifies homosexual promiscuity saying that "Gay men's 'obsession' with sex...should be celebrated..." This according to Bersani, is shocking to people considering the huge AIDS epidemic because "AIDS offers a new sign for the symbolic machinery of repression, making the rectum a grave." Bersani argues against this homophobic notion by saying that gay sexuality should not be hidden and pushed aside. Heterosexual people with "heterosexual anxieties" use AIDS as a tool to discriminate against homosexual men saying that sex with multiple partners is wrong and dangerous; however, I found the article giving off the notion that for the gay male community, what is more dangerous is not having sex because of that.

Bersani's innovative ideas about sexual promiscuity and sexual equality signify the need for change. His ideas for change, however, are not backed up with sufficient evidence and lacks a plan which people in need of this change can carry out. Through a culmination of MacKinnon's and Dworkin's work, Bersani has come up with "the redemptive reinvention of sex..." which "has as its very condition of possibility a certain refusal of sex as we know it..." with an "agreement about sexuality as

...

...

Download as:   txt (9.2 Kb)   pdf (109.3 Kb)   docx (12.1 Kb)  
Continue for 6 more pages »
Only available on Essays24.com