Efficiency of Cash Flow Comparison Between Hwa Tai Industries Berhad and Hup Seng Industries Berhad
Essay by Yvonne Wong • November 18, 2018 • Term Paper • 878 Words (4 Pages) • 1,254 Views
Essay Preview: Efficiency of Cash Flow Comparison Between Hwa Tai Industries Berhad and Hup Seng Industries Berhad
Efficiency of cash flow comparison between Hwa Tai Industries Berhad and Hup Seng Industries Berhad
Formulas:
Cash and cash equivalent flows= (Cash and bank balances+ Short-term deposits
placed with a licensed bank) – bank overdraft
HWA TAI INDUSTRIES BERHAD
YEAR | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
Cash and bank balance (RM) | 3,320,191 | 2,460,594 | 1,657,388 | 1,124,706 | 2,348,425 |
Short-term deposits placed with a licensed bank (RM) | - | - | - | - | 7,059,807 |
Bank Overdraft (RM) | 3,281,132 | 3,489,588 | 2,453,321 | 2,280,841 | 4,001,201 |
Cash and cash equivalent (RM) | 39,059 | -1,028,994 | -795,933 | -1,156,135 | 5,407,031 |
Formula: Deposit with licensed banks + cash and cash balance
HUP SENG INDUSTRIS BERHAD
YEAR | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
Cash and cash balance (RM) | 179,604 | 3,204,043 | 231,876 | 157,224 | 250,376 |
Deposit with licensed banks (RM) | 25,520,250 | 35,000,000 | 28,732,418 | 39,107,310 | 36,058,410 |
Cash and cash equivalent (RM) | 25,699,854 | 38,204,043 | 28,964,294 | 39,264,534 | 36,308,786 |
Tables above show cash and cash equivalent flows of Hwa Tai Industries Berhad and Hup Seng Industries Berhad from year 2011 to year 2015.
In year 2011, cash and cash equivalent of Hup Seng Industries Berhad achieved RM 25,699,854 compared to Hwa Tai at RM 39,059. The value of cash and cash equivalent was affected by the act of Hwa Tai in stated net of bank overdrafts repayable on demands which is RM 3,281,132. In this case, Hup Seng had more advantage, the addition of deposit with licensed bank (RM 25,520,250) with cash and cash balance exist (RM 179,604) resulted a higher amounts in cash and cash equivalent and a higher efficiency of cash flow in Hup Seng compared to Hwa Tai.
However, situation of Hwa Tai turn worst while its cash and cash equivalent becomes negative value at year 2012. Inversely, cash and cash equivalent of Hup seng increased from RM25, 699,854 in year 2011 into RM38, 204,043 in year 2012. The less efficiency of Hwa Tai may associates with the poor net cash flow used in financing activities which is –RM 1,592,230 due to the high amount of net repayment to subsidiary companies, drawdown of terms loans and net repayment of finance lease liabilities which is RM 521,734 , RM 481,179 and RM 524 893. High efficient growth in cash flows of Hup Seng may linked to the high amount of net cash flows in operating and investing activities compared to previous year.
...
...