Essays24.com - Term Papers and Free Essays
Search

Tax Avoidance Vs. Tax Evasion

Essay by   •  December 28, 2010  •  1,920 Words (8 Pages)  •  1,468 Views

Essay Preview: Tax Avoidance Vs. Tax Evasion

Report this essay
Page 1 of 8

TAX AVOIDANCE vs. TAX EVASION

From the time taxes were first imposed on American citizens, people have been trying to find ways to escape paying them. While some taxpayers continue to find legal ways to avoid paying a portion of their taxes, others simply choose to evade taxes or not pay them at all. Avoiding taxes and evading taxes may sound like similar actions, but the two terms have very different meanings. Avoiding taxes can be accomplished though various legal means, whereas evading taxes is highly illegal and can result in severe penalties. In order to effectively reduce taxes without suffering serious consequences, it is critical that all taxpayers fully understand the differences between avoiding taxes and evading taxes.

Clearly understanding what separates tax avoidance from tax evasion is a vital step for any taxpayer who wishes to save money on taxes without breaking the law. The most important difference between these two situations is that avoiding taxes can be done legally, while evading taxes cannot. In fact, tax avoidance is defined as "the minimization of tax liability by lawful methods" (freedictionary.com). Anytime methods outside of the legal boundaries are used to avoid taxes, it is considered to be tax evasion. There is a fine line which separates these two actions and as one tax professor explained "you can legally avoid paying taxes through smart business planning", but the minute you step over the line, you are evading taxes (esbinlaw.com).

Many different methods can be used to legally avoid taxes. It is up to the taxpayers to understand these methods so that they can benefit from the tax savings without breaking the law. The two most commonly used methods to avoid taxes include income deferral and income tax deductions. Income deferral, the first method mentioned, involves postponing the receipt of income until a succeeding tax year. This legal method of avoiding taxes is based on the "wherewithal-to-pay" concept and it is allowed by the government only under certain specific conditions. The idea behind this concept is that taxpayers should not be obligated to pay taxes until they have the ability to pay, which occurs only when income is recognized. This method is often beneficial to taxpayers due to the progressive tax rates. If gross income is lower in a subsequent year, then the deferred income will be taxed at a lower rate, rather then the current tax rate. Income deferral is also used frequently by businesses which use accrual basis accounting. These businesses are often able to defer income that is received from advanced payments for good or services. The IRS specifies this rule in Revenue Proceeding 2004-34, where it states that "qualifying taxpayers generally may defer to the next succeeding taxable year the inclusion in gross income for federal income tax purposes of advance payments (as defined in section 4 of this revenue procedure) to the extent the advance payments are not recognized in revenues (or, in certain cases, are not earned) in the taxable year of receipt" (irs.gov). This method of deferring taxes is again based on the "wherewithal-to-pay" concept.

Another widely used method to defer taxes is through employer-sponsored retirement plans such as Roth IRA's or 401K plans. Individuals who are enrolled in these plans are able to defer paying income taxes until the funds are withdrawn, typically after retirement. The amount of taxes paid on the funds when they are withdrawn is often much less then the amount the individual would owe at his or her current tax rate (investopedia.com). Deferring taxes can prove to be a great way for taxpayers to avoid paying taxes, but it is important that it is done carefully and within the restraints of the law.

A second and very popular way in which taxes can legally be avoided is through the use of tax deductions. Taxpayer's are able to use tax deductions to reduce their total income, which decreases the amount of taxes that are due. The government grants tax deductions in order to support or encourage certain behaviors, spending patterns and lifestyles, which are considered desirable (irs.gov). For instance, the government allows taxpayers to deduct contributions made to qualified charitable organizations, such as religious groups or non-profit agencies. The law specifies that the amount of this deduction cannot exceed 50% of a taxpayer's gross income. By allowing taxpayers to deduct charitable contributions, the government is encouraging the act of donating. This is not only beneficial to the taxpayer, but it is beneficial to society as a whole.

A newer and much more complex deduction granted by the U.S. government is the Section 199, domestic production activities deduction (DPAD). This "manufacturers' deduction" was created with the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. It is available to a "variety of taxpayers including individuals, partnerships, S-corporations, cooperatives, estates and trusts" (Hoffman 3-2). The purpose of this deduction is to encourage domestic manufacturing and to increase the availability of jobs to U.S. citizens. Only certain activities which are defined by the IRS qualify for this deduction. These activities include the "manufacture, production, growth or extraction of intangible personal property, computer software, sound recordings or qualified films; the production of electricity, natural gas or potable water in the U.S.; and construction services including related engineering and architectural services performed in the U.S" (granthorton.com). Once it is determined that the activity qualifies for the deduction, the actual amount that is allowed to be deducted depends on several factors. First, the Qualified Production Activities Income (QPAI) must be determined. This is equal to the domestic production gross receipts less related expenses. Once this amount is calculated, the taxpayer is able to deduct a percentage of the lesser of taxable income or the net QPAI. The percentage amount is equal to 6 percent in the years 2007 through 2009, and then the amount will go up to 9 percent for all years thereafter (Hoffman 3-3).

Understanding how to calculate the DPAD deduction can prove to be quite complex, but often times the savings can be worth the effort.

The U.S. government has approved a great number of other tax deductions that are intended to be both beneficial to taxpayers as well as to the economy. The charitable contributions deduction and the DPAD deduction are just two examples of how the government uses tax deductions to encourage certain activities. Legally avoiding taxes through both income deferral and tax deductions is not only allowed by the government,

...

...

Download as:   txt (11.3 Kb)   pdf (130.4 Kb)   docx (13 Kb)  
Continue for 7 more pages »
Only available on Essays24.com
Citation Generator

(2010, 12). Tax Avoidance Vs. Tax Evasion. Essays24.com. Retrieved 12, 2010, from https://www.essays24.com/essay/Tax-Avoidance-Vs-Tax-Evasion/26308.html

"Tax Avoidance Vs. Tax Evasion" Essays24.com. 12 2010. 2010. 12 2010 <https://www.essays24.com/essay/Tax-Avoidance-Vs-Tax-Evasion/26308.html>.

"Tax Avoidance Vs. Tax Evasion." Essays24.com. Essays24.com, 12 2010. Web. 12 2010. <https://www.essays24.com/essay/Tax-Avoidance-Vs-Tax-Evasion/26308.html>.

"Tax Avoidance Vs. Tax Evasion." Essays24.com. 12, 2010. Accessed 12, 2010. https://www.essays24.com/essay/Tax-Avoidance-Vs-Tax-Evasion/26308.html.