- Term Papers and Free Essays

Compression Between "Hills Like White Elephant" And Japanese Quince"

Essay by   •  December 28, 2010  •  2,177 Words (9 Pages)  •  2,519 Views

Essay Preview: Compression Between "Hills Like White Elephant" And Japanese Quince"

Report this essay
Page 1 of 9

Point of view, character symbol/irony and theme are the three main writing styles that differentiate "The Japanese Quince" from "Hills like White Elephants". Though they may be the two shortest stories in Perrine's literature, the quality of these literatures does no lack superiority. John Galsworthy and Ernest Hemingway are both extraordinary writers and their writhing style are highly commendable. John Galsworthy's use of character is extremely unique. "The Japanese Quince" is written in indirect presentation; Galsworthy never really shows us the character in action. We, the readers, must infer what the characters are like from what the characters think, say and do. In this short story, all the protagonist does is step outside, walk up to a tree and then walk back home. There is not that much action or a straightforward explanation of the character. The reader must decipher clues in the story in order to understand the characters. Without the many details of the setting and the environment around Mr. Nilson, it would remain unknown to the reader whether Mr. Nilson was a round character or a static character. These small details are the only manner to determine Mr. Nelson's life behind his solitary walk around the gardens.

'He stood staring curiously at this tree, recognizing it for that which he noticed from his window. It was covered with young blossoms, pink and white, and little bright green leaves the sunlight glistened. Mr. Nilson smiled; the little tree was so alive and pretty! And instead of passing on, he stayed there smiling at the tree. "Morning like this!" he thought; "and hear I am the only person in the square who has the --- to come out and---!'(Page 74, paragraph 8).

This was the closest the character of Mr. Nilson became, to becoming a developing character. He was so close to experiencing nature, filling that hole in his heart, changing, and understanding what that pain within him represented. Why did he stop? He saw his mirror image, right next to him experiencing the same sensations. Now, instead of understanding and changing his problem of lack of connection to nature and social life he accepts it and never finishing his sentence. It was more then just one sentence, it was his whole life. 'Unaccountably upset, Mr. Nilson turned abruptly into the house, and opened his morning paper' (page 75, paragraph 26). He lost his only chance of ever changing his life, causing him to become permanently a static character.

Because "Hills Like White Elephants" is told in direct presentation, the characteristic of the protagonist varies in many ways and fits into many different categories. Because of manipulation the characteristic of the girl is finally defined. The story is told by someone other then the main character and the analysis of the character is a lot more forthright and simple, emphasizing dramatized characters, which is when the characters are speaking and acting as if in a drama, and this is what the whole story is, one play with dialogues. The protagonist, the girl, is a round character. She has many sides behind what the story presents, unlike the boy who can be easily defined in a sentence or two. One side of the girl understands the issue of abortion and sees it as a big issue that keep on growing, but, then the other side of her neglects the issue like the boy, as to not interfere with her relationship. Because of this internal conflict, she becomes a static character. "I feel fine," she said. "There's nothing wrong with me. I feel fine" (page 173, line110). Influenced by the boy, she doesn't confront her problems. Instead she bottles up the huge issue inside and plays it off as nothing is wrong, causing her to become a non-developing character. Character is the only aspect of literature in which these stories are similar. In both 'Hills Like White Elephant' and 'Japanese Quince', the protagonists are static and round characters. Mr. Nilson and the girl walk away from their problems. Both characters try to change and are on the right path, however the antagonist is never far behind. No mater if it is Mr. Tandram from 'Japanese Quince' or the boy in Hills Like White Elephant. The antagonist comes from behind and pulls the antagonist down to their knees. This is why Mr. Nilson never finished his sentence. This why the girl's last line was, "I feel fine" (page, line 110). This is why they are static characters. 

"The Japanese Quince" is written in limited omniscient. The story is told in the third person and in the view point of Mr. Nilson. Galsworthy goes into the mind, body and thoughts of Mr. Nilson and never leaves his side. The author describes what Mr. Nilson sees, feels and thinks. However, he only plays God for only this one particular character. We are never given the opportunity to delve into Mr. Tandram's thoughts. The reason Galsworthy uses limited omniscient is to tell this story is to narrate of course but also to pick out specific information from one character thought. He uses this to get his theme across to the readers. As reading this story we can find that this type of writing is effective. We, the readers, only know what the author tells us.

The 'White Hill Like Elephant' is written in the objective point of view, also known as the dramatic point of view. The narrator disappears from the story and after the first paragraph, the whole story is like a play, it then becomes a dialog between a man and women. 'It stopped at this junction for two minutes and went onto Madrid. "What should we drink?" the girl asked. She had taken off her hat and put in on the table" (Page, line 0-2) In this story were not allowed to reach into the mind of the characters. We see what the American girl and the boy do and hear and say and then it is up to us to interpret the diction and language of the author to find out their true emotions. The logic behind the authors choice if writing this piece in dialogs is to get the readers too interpret the feelings and emotion of the character. The narrator fads away and it now up to the reader to carefully analyze the stores detail and come up with a conclusion.

Limited omniscient point of view and objective point of view are extremely different. In the "The Japanese Quince" the point of view is different than life in reality. We read the story in God's view, and we were able to go inside of the mind of Mr. Nelson. Now, where as in 'Hills Like White Elephant', the story is told as if you where watching a movie. The camera is pointed at the two characters and we sit there eavesdropping. The reader doesn't have any supernatural powers, mind reading is not allowed, we must interpret



Download as:   txt (12.2 Kb)   pdf (136.9 Kb)   docx (13.1 Kb)  
Continue for 8 more pages »
Only available on
Citation Generator

(2010, 12). Compression Between "Hills Like White Elephant" And Japanese Quince". Retrieved 12, 2010, from

"Compression Between "Hills Like White Elephant" And Japanese Quince"" 12 2010. 2010. 12 2010 <>.

"Compression Between "Hills Like White Elephant" And Japanese Quince".", 12 2010. Web. 12 2010. <>.

"Compression Between "Hills Like White Elephant" And Japanese Quince"." 12, 2010. Accessed 12, 2010.