Essays24.com - Term Papers and Free Essays
Search

Compare And Contrast The Criminal And Civil Law

Essay by   •  April 24, 2011  •  1,151 Words (5 Pages)  •  3,044 Views

Essay Preview: Compare And Contrast The Criminal And Civil Law

Report this essay
Page 1 of 5

Civil law is concerned and deals with the relationship between individuals and relates to civil rather than criminal wrongs with the aim of compensating the suing party for such wrongs (Gibson, Rigby, Ryan & Tamsitt, 2001, p28.1). A civil action is generally brought by the party who has been injured or otherwise suffered some form of loss as the result of a wrong which only directly affected him (e.g. trespassing into private property). When a civil law is broken, legal action is brought by an individual against another for some form of legal remedy, e.g. damages. In civil suits, the party initiating legal proceedings is referred to as the plaintiff and the party being sued is called the defendant. For a plaintiff to successfully seek damages from the defendant he or she needs to prove their case, this is called the burden of proof. The amount of proof required by the law is called the standard of proof and in civil cases the standard of proof is assessed on the balance of probabilities (Dowler & Miles, 2001, p.32).

Private security officers working in an organisation have limited powers when compared with public police officers. In most instances the private security officer only possesses the power of citizen's arrest. In most civil actions, especially those involving private security officers, the basis is not on intended harm but a claim that the defendant was negligent (Purpura, 1998, p 61). Negligence is defined as the liability for breach of a duty to take reasonable care (Gardiner & McGlone, 1998, p 8). Security managers in organisations should take necessary action to ensure the safety and security of individual on their premise. There have been countless lawsuits against the management of organisations for failing to provide adequate protection for it stakeholders. An example of such a civil case is Walter A Stewart v Federated Department Stores, No.15124, Connecticut Supreme Court in 1995 (Purpura, 1998, p 63). Marion Javery was returning to her car after shopping at Bloomingdales departmental store. She was then approached from behind by a man and he made it clear to her that he was robbing her. Javery resisted and thus she was stabbed and left to die in the car park. Walter Steward, the administrator of her estate, sued Bloomingdale's parent company, Federated Department Store Inc, for not undertaking adequate security measures to protect Javery from intended harm. The standard of proof for this case is strong; the company had 5 security officers and only 1 was stationed at the car park and he was usually called away to monitor the unloading dock, more than 300 florescent light bulbs were not working on that day, there were no gates or fences to keep undesirable people from the car park, the store was in a high crime area, and finally despite numerous requests from employees for increased security, nothing was done on the part of the management. As a result the Connecticut Supreme Court upheld a USD$1.5 million liability award to the estate of Marion Javery.

Criminal law on the other hand is concerned about protecting society from people who commit crimes as prescribed by the common and statutory laws. Criminal law's purpose is conventionally stated as being retribution, deterrence, restraint, and rehabilitation (Gillies, 1990, p 6). In criminal cases the prosecution represents the public or society in taking legal action against the party whom it considers to have committed a crime and seeks to have that party punished. Similar to civil law, criminal law requires the party commencing legal proceedings to carry the burden of proof i.e. the prosecutor. However since criminal penalties are far more severe than penalties for civil suits, the law needs a stricter standard of proof. For the prosecution to successfully convict the defendant, it needs to prove the case beyond any reasonable doubt (Dowler & Miles, 2001, p.33).

Criminal liability is most often used against private security personnel in cases of assault, battery, manslaughter, and murder (Fisher & Green, 1992, p 150). Some of the ways security personnel may defend themselves in a court of law is to argue that they were entitled to use force in self defence or that they had made a reasonable mistake which would neglect criminal intent. Security personnel may also be held liable for failing to perform the job they were employed to do. For example if a security officer working in an organisation were to witness someone getting robbed at knife point and does nothing to assist the victim,

...

...

Download as:   txt (7 Kb)   pdf (94 Kb)   docx (11.3 Kb)  
Continue for 4 more pages »
Only available on Essays24.com
Citation Generator

(2011, 04). Compare And Contrast The Criminal And Civil Law. Essays24.com. Retrieved 04, 2011, from https://www.essays24.com/essay/Compare-And-Contrast-The-Criminal-And-Civil-Law/45945.html

"Compare And Contrast The Criminal And Civil Law" Essays24.com. 04 2011. 2011. 04 2011 <https://www.essays24.com/essay/Compare-And-Contrast-The-Criminal-And-Civil-Law/45945.html>.

"Compare And Contrast The Criminal And Civil Law." Essays24.com. Essays24.com, 04 2011. Web. 04 2011. <https://www.essays24.com/essay/Compare-And-Contrast-The-Criminal-And-Civil-Law/45945.html>.

"Compare And Contrast The Criminal And Civil Law." Essays24.com. 04, 2011. Accessed 04, 2011. https://www.essays24.com/essay/Compare-And-Contrast-The-Criminal-And-Civil-Law/45945.html.