- Term Papers and Free Essays

A Comparative View of Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Network (wsn)

Essay by   •  February 16, 2017  •  Research Paper  •  4,367 Words (18 Pages)  •  1,325 Views

Essay Preview: A Comparative View of Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Network (wsn)

Report this essay
Page 1 of 18


The latest advancements in WSNs (Wireless Sensor Network) have led to many new protocol created for WSNs in which energy interest is an important factor. WSNs with countless numbers to a large number of sensor nodes that can collect data from an unwatched area as well as transfer the collected information to a particular user, based on the program. Information is directed from one unit to another applying various protocols. WSNs have variety of routing protocols. This paper describes the structure of Wireless sensor networks. Describe the routing protocol based on some key components and discussed their function of operation. This paper also provides the comparative view on various protocols.


Wireless sensor networks, routing protocols


A WSN (Wireless Sensor Network) has a huge number of lower powers multiple operational sensor-nodes, working in an unwatched atmosphere, and having recognizing, computations and interaction abilities. Its elements are an analogue-to-digital Ripper, a CPU, an energy system as well as an interaction system. In most situations WSNs are fixed or quasi-stationary, while node flexibility can be ignored. There is no prearrangement supposition about particular part each node should execute. Each node creates its choice individually, depending on the scenario in the implementation area and its information about the system. It is applied in various surroundings, circumstances as well as executes projects of different types and their program wills situation the system and the option of technological innovation for its development. The system methods applied in the situation of systems which working variety includes a single developing can vary from those working within large space places. The development of a system able of doing its process needs acquiring data on the device it consists of. The essential information is the following: place of system nodes, acceptable energy of stereo transmitter and options for control of indication energy, approximated variety of system nodes, and variety of unit that can be missing before the system is announced non functional [1, 2].

Sensor nodes are MSME (Micro-Electro-Mechanical System) techniques to produce a significant respond to modify in some durability like heat range and stress. It evaluates actual information of the location to be examined. The constant analogue indication sense through the receptors is scanned by an ADR (analogue to digital ripper) as well as it transmit to remote control for additional managing and indicator unit are of extremely little dimension. It use incredibly low energy and managed into great densities plus it is independent as well as flexible to the atmosphere [3].

Its durability within the place might be great then 20 nodes. WSN are generally extremely small technology and it preserve only be organized through a restricted energy source. All sensor nodes have a certain region of security which can effectively as well as perfectly for particular amount that it is monitoring. Various resources of power utilization in sensor are indication analyzing along with adjustment of real alerts in the direction of electric powered kinds, indication scenario and analog to digital transformation [4].

The sensor node is categorized into three groups: a) Inactive Online: It senses the surroundings without adjusting it by effective searching. In this situation, the power is required only to increase their analog alerts and no idea of trend in calculating the atmosphere; b) Inactive, narrow beam: It involved concerning the route as soon as realizing the atmosphere, and c) Active: it attempts to probe the atmosphere. It has restricted recognizing, computations abilities, connections efficiency as well as energy. The various number of program devices are assigned over a topic for collecting information. This unit can link with each other for providing or obtaining data either straight or via other advanced unit. All node in an indicator program features as a wireless router within the system [5].

In immediate interaction routing protocols (single hop), all indicator join provides immediately with a manage middle known as BS (base-station) and provides collected data. It is set and situated at a distance from the indicator. It can link with the end client both straight or via some present wired system. The indicator system changes very consistently. Joins may not have international recognition. Because the variety among the indicator unit and Bs is huge and they use energy easily. On the other hand multi-hop, information is instructed through innovative unit to the BS and it will preserve you providing node energy.

A routing protocol identifies how routers connect with each other, distributing details which enable them to pick route among any two units in the system, the routing protocol select the path. All wireless routers have a priori details only of the systems connected to it straight. It share this details first among immediate others who live nearby and then it share data with other system [6].

In this paper I am discuss the structure of wireless sensor network. Classify the routing protocol based on some key components and discussed their function of operation. This paper also provides the comparison on various protocols.

The rest of paper structure is, in Sec 2 Related. In Sec 3, described Applications. Then Sensor Network Structure and Design Issues are discussed in sec 4. In Sec 5, details of Current Routing Protocols. Comparison of routing protocols is presented in Sec 6. In Sec 7 Critical Review. Finally, Conclusion is in Sec 8.

2. Related Work

The authors work on a WSN with fixed and cellular nodes. The fixed detectors observe the atmosphere as well as report activities taking place in the detecting area. The authors suggested a central and an allocated heuristics to plan cellular sensors going tracks. Their heuristics permitted randomly variety of cellular receptors and occasion places in all circular and had an energy-balanced idea in mind. They try to reduce cellular detectors shifting power while maintaining their power usage balanced [7].

The authors suggested one of the first information centric redirecting methods for wireless-sensor-networks. The three major inadequacies in a redirecting method for WSN are; a) implosion, b) overlap and, c) resource-blindness. It was maintained by discussion and resource-adaption methods. The suggested strategy revealed 3.5 times power saving than data racing [8].

The authors proposed a PCP (Probabilistic-Coverage Protocol). It regarded probabilistic realizing designs. PCP was



Download as:   txt (27.8 Kb)   pdf (152.3 Kb)   docx (19.3 Kb)  
Continue for 17 more pages »
Only available on
Citation Generator

(2017, 02). A Comparative View of Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Network (wsn). Retrieved 02, 2017, from

"A Comparative View of Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Network (wsn)" 02 2017. 2017. 02 2017 <>.

"A Comparative View of Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Network (wsn).", 02 2017. Web. 02 2017. <>.

"A Comparative View of Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Network (wsn)." 02, 2017. Accessed 02, 2017.