Metalcraft Supplier Scorecard
Essay by Trang0309 • May 17, 2017 • Essay • 330 Words (2 Pages) • 1,306 Views
ANALYSIS AND SELECTED SOLUTION
ANALYSIS
AutoParts Inc | Electroparts | Caltek’s Inc | |
Price | Lowest price | Higher than Autoparts10% | Compare to AutoParts |
Recommended by | Mark Mueller- the commodity purchasing agent | Ellie Smith- a Metalcraft Quality supervisor | Darrell Bonds- a product engineer Mark Lechter- Metalcraft’s Corporate Supplier Development(SD) manager |
Ranking | Yellow- remained on a “restricted” list | Green- high quality parts | Red- “no-quote” list |
Past/ recent experience with Metalcraft | Not performance well | Pleased with the final product | Impressed with the their team by the design of the rubber vent hoses |
Technical capacity | Not mention | Not mention | Exceeded that of AutoParts and Electroparts |
Level of signature | Low-level | Not mention | High-level |
Through the analysis of three suppliers, we think that Mark Mueller should choose the Caltek Inc who will supply for sourcing of the rubber vent houses. There are some reasons why they should select it:
Firstly, to bring more profit for the company we should look the price of the suppliers. When we compare the price between Caltek, AutoParts and Electroparts, it is not difficult to see that the price of Caltek will obviously cheaper than others. Because of the price of Autoparts is lowest, while the price of Electroparts higher than Autoparts by 10% and the price of Caltek was compare with Autoparts. In addition, Caltek’s Inc was recommended by Darrell Bonds who is a product engineer and Mark Lechter who is Metalcraft’s Corporate Supplier Development (SD) manager.
...
...