Peer Evaluation

EEE 457 Peer and Team Evaluation

Peer Evaluation:  For this evaluation, please consider factors such as meeting attendance, timeliness and quality of work, significance of input, creativity, and overall contribution.  Please rank your team mates (including yourself) from 1-5 (1 is the highest ranking and 5 is the lowest ranking) and provide a brief rationale for your ranking.  This is a forced ranking assignment and you may not rank everyone equally.

1. Ting Sen Chau – only person went to the judge meeting. Always show up for group meeting. Active during group chat.

2. Hanzhe Tang – Show up to group meeting. Hard working for the past assignments. Active during group chat.

3. Jake Woloshin – Active during group chat. However, tend to ignore the assigned meeting time.

4. Pratik Paul – sometime active during group chat. Tend to not show up for meeting for most of the time. Didn’t contribute anything for the first assignment.

5. Emily Murphy  -  Busty with her own job, ignoring meeting time, tend to ignore group chat.

Team Evaluation:  Rank your team from 1-5 on the following attributes and provide a brief rationale for your rankings.

_5_Team Cohesion – Can get work done as team

_5_Productivity – Can get work done as team

_5_Collegiality (getting along) – Communicable, no  aggressive tone during conversation

_5_Equal distribution and completion of work – questions for each assignment are equally distributed

_3_Effectiveness of meetings – hardly any meeting

_4_Overall team functioning – good efficiency, but hardly any meeting

Is there anything you would like me to know about your team?

        Hardly anyone attend group meeting

Are there factors I should consider in the future when assigning teams?