Relationship Between Media And SocietyThis essay Relationship Between Media And Society is available for you on Essays24.com! Search Term Papers, College Essay Examples and Free Essays on Essays24.com - full papers database.
Autor: anton • April 28, 2011 • 1,902 Words (8 Pages) • 1,932 Views
The following essay will concentrate on the reciprocal relationship between the media and society, focusing on journalism in particular. A brief overview of the terms used in this essay will be used first to create a common understanding. This will be achieved by discussing theories regarding mass media and journalism as separate entities. The two will then be combined to discuss how mass media affects , and is affected by society. This will be done by referring to the many theories regarding journalism and mass media and how thy correspond with society using theories such as the normative press theories.
To understand the effect of something, one first needs to understand the subject itself. Therefore to discuss the effect of mass media, one must fully understand the concept of mass communication and how it functions as an integral part of society. Only once this concept is understood, can it be discussed as a reactor to change in society. The paragraph following will explain the phenomenon of mass media.
Mass communication can simply be described as a message sent to a large audience. The audience that the message is referred to as a homogenous audience. This means the audience has a varied mix of people within it. The message can therefore be considered to be completely unbiased as many different types of people will be exposed to it. This however, is not true. When an advertising agency puts up a billboard for instance, it will be put in a certain area and will in turn be exposed to a particular audience. This group will be referred to as the target audience. A message cannot be effective unless sent through a particular medium. A medium is he way the message is transmitted. In the case of the advertising agency, the medium would be the billboard. The mediums used by mass communication are referred to as mass media. Mass media is the vehicle for the transmission of media messages and can consist of newspapers, film, radio, etc.
With this understanding the effect of mass communication can be better understood. According to Pember, (1987: 2), Ð²Ð‚Ñšmass media is constantly supplying us with information, and influencing, educating or entertaining usÐ²Ð‚Ñœ. Pember is referring to the two functions of mass media, namely: the information function and entertainment function. Mass communication cannot be separated from the individual or society. It is a part of everyday life as a pervasive force, as stated by Pember. Hiebert, Ungurait & Bohn (1991) are also noted for saying that mass communication is as much part of modern society as are schools, churches and businesses. It can also be described as one of the important subsystems of society together with the political, economic, cultural and other subsystems. It can hence be concluded that mass communication must always exist in a social context and therefore affect it and be affected in turn by society.
The following paragraphs will establish what is meant by the term journalism and the ways in which it affects and is affected by society. Journalism can be described as the process of gathering and reporting news to mass audiences with the in intention of informing them. Journalism can be said to be fulfilling the information function of mass media. Vincent CampbellÐ²Ð‚™s quotes (Hartley in Campbell, 2004: 1) of John Hartley can be considered to answer the question of journalism in modern society. Hartley asked what it is that journalism does. He stated that news organizations exist where there is democracy and where there is not. They exist where government is largely open and where decision making is largely secret. They can be found where parties are strong or weak, where public ownership of communication media is powerful or absent. That question was answered by Francois Nel (2001: 3) when he said Ð²Ð‚ÑšWe need news to live our lives. It helps us to distinguish between threats and opportunities, enemies and friends. News helps us orientate ourselves, and it helps us connect with others. If the mass media are the system that societies generate to supply this news, then journalism is its lifeblood. That is why the character of the news and the quality of the journalism are important; they influence our thoughts, our experiences, our culturesÐ²Ð‚Ñœ.
Michael OÐ²Ð‚™Shaughnessy and Jane Stadler (Journalism 2A Reader) have analyzed the relationship between society and the media by examining three key areas namely: contemporary society, how the media works, the effects and influence of the media on society. OÐ²Ð‚™Shaughnessy and Stadler firstly noted three characteristics of contemporary society namely: change and crisis, inequality and difference, and maintaining consent in western democracies. The next area they focused on was the way in which media works. They gave three Ð²Ð‚Ñšstaring point positionsÐ²Ð‚Ñœ on how the media works. The first, representation: Ð²Ð‚Ñšmedia products do not show or represent the real world; they construct and re-present realityÐ²Ð‚Ñœ. The second, interpretation: Ð²Ð‚Ñšthe media are just one of the ways by which we and society make sense of the world, or construct the worldÐ²Ð‚Ñœ. The final one, evaluation: Ð²Ð‚Ñšthe media are owned, controlled, and created by certain groups who make sense of society on behalf of othersÐ²Ð‚Ñœ. From this it is clear that mass media is a cultural phenomenon which exists in a societal context.
Another way to discuss the effect of media on society would be to examine the normative press theories. In order to understand the normative press theories a brief description of the terms will be given. Normative refers to something being Ð²Ð‚ÑšnormalÐ²Ð‚Ñœ, or of what ought to be. All the normative press theories conform to what is considered normal. The purpose of press theories is to understand, describe and explain how and why the media operates differently in various countries or contexts as described by Siebert, Peterson and Schramm (Journalism 2A Reader), who wrote about the media in the 1950Ð²Ð‚™s. they were also trying to establish whether the media serves a different purpose in the different political contexts it is situated. Siebert, Peterson and Schramm wanted to establish a relationship between different countries and the media within these countries. They used a process called common analysis which is looking at things that appear to be similar but have rather apparent differences. The context in which these things operate is crucial to the effectiveness of common analysis. The context of mass media can be considered as the social context. The media is also greatly affected by the political climate of a country. From these findings Siebert, Peterson and Schramm developed two media theories; Authoritarian and