Libraries Should Use Software Filters For Internet AccessThis essay Libraries Should Use Software Filters For Internet Access is available for you on Essays24.com! Search Term Papers, College Essay Examples and Free Essays on Essays24.com - full papers database.
Autor: anton • May 7, 2011 • 871 Words (4 Pages) • 1,037 Views
Libraries Should Use Software Filters for Internet Access
Public libraries provide us with a large amount of information. Residents can borrow books from libraries. Libraries also provide Internet access for everyone, including children. Since parents cannot control what then children are seeing on the Internet in libraries, children can access pornographic or violent sites easily. So, public libraries should restrict Internet access by utilizing filtering software to prevent children from seeing those inappropriate sites.
The American Libraries Association (ALA) insists that it is improper for public libraries to use filtering software since libraries have to provide broad materials for patrons. Their claim that filtering software may limit oneÐ²Ð‚™s access to legitimate information may be valid. The ALA has stated:
Current blocking/filtering software prevents not only access to what some consider Ð²Ð‚ÑšobjectionableÐ²Ð‚Ñœ material, but also blocks information protected by the Fist Amendment. The result is that legal and useful material will inevitably be blocked. Examples of sites that have been blocked by popular commercial blocking/filtering products include those on breast cancer, AIDS, womenÐ²Ð‚™s rights, and animal rights (Ð²Ð‚ÑšStatement on Internet FilteringÐ²Ð‚Ñœ 2).
Those sites can be restricted by filtering software. But, filtering software does not restrict all the materials on breast cancer, AIDS, womenÐ²Ð‚™s rights, and animal rights. The ALA states that blocking/filtering software is a mechanism used to restrict access to scanning content based on a keyword, phrase, or text (American Libraries Association 2). Some of there sites are blocked simply because they may contain words that filtering software is programmed to block. Those cites which is restricted might contain a lot of words recognized as Ð²Ð‚ÑšinappropriateÐ²Ð‚Ñœ such as the word Ð²Ð‚ÑšsexÐ²Ð‚Ñœ. So, filtering software may occasionally not being able to access those sites to be inappropriate site due to this content. However, it is not a problem if it does not disturb people using the computer. David Burt states that the average number of complaints each month. Seven out of twenty four of the libraries reported never receiving a single complaint (2). Therefore, according to these statistics, the restrictions of filtering software do not bother the majority of people who use the internet in libraries.
The ALA also states that public libraries should not restrict Internet access in libraries because filtering software is imposing someone elseÐ²Ð‚™s moral code on everyone who uses the programs. Software companies and producers who are outside of communities which administer libraries decide the criteria. Those software companies and producers who are outside of the communities decide whether information contained in Web pages is appropriate or not for children. Their viewpoints of appropriate information influence all children in the communities. Their viewpoints can limit childrenÐ²Ð‚™s thoughts. So, information should be selected by librarians who are involved with the communities. While third parties make the filtering software, producers check the contents of sites and eliminate what they consider to be inappropriate. According to David BurtÐ²Ð‚™s book, buying books on an approval plan or buying full-text magazines on a CD-ROM also involves letting a