Presidential Influence On Teenage Drug AbuseThis essay Presidential Influence On Teenage Drug Abuse is available for you on Essays24.com! Search Term Papers, College Essay Examples and Free Essays on Essays24.com - full papers database.
Autor: anton • November 20, 2010 • 829 Words (4 Pages) • 518 Views
Presidential Influence and Teenage Drug Abuse.
"Just don't do it", the slogan from Bob Dole's anti-drug campaign upon a cursory
evaluation, may appear to have been an inefficient way of confronting the growing
problem of national drug abuse. After all, it is hardly reasonable to believe that a
potential drug user will specifically consider these words before deciding whether
to get high or not.
However, this slogan, and the man that stands behind it, represents a sorely
needed, value-oriented stance on the issue that was lacking in the Clinton
administration. The president's cavalier attitude was responsible for a dramatic
increase in drug abuse among teenagers. While Clinton's baby boomer generation
dismissed aggressive anti-drug campaigns as ineffectual, the truth is that tough
approaches to the problem have proven to be very successful. The Nixon, Reagan
and Bush Sr. administrations are direct examples of this.
When Richard Nixon began his first term, use of marijuana and heroin had
reached an all-time high. In response, he vowed to wage a national attack on
narcotics abuse, which involved reducing the flow of drugs into the country while
stepping up drug treatment programs. Nixon began his work by arranging for the
extradition of noted heroin chemists, and sent ambassadors to negotiate narcotics
agreements with foreign countries. Turkey, which provided about 80 percent of the
U.S. heroin supply promised a complete cessation of its production in exchange for
$35.7 million in aid. On the national level, the Nixon administration further proved
its dedication to the cause by legalizing the use of drugs to combat addiction and by
encouraging anti-drug commercials and television programs. Although many were
doubtful that these measures would have any impact, they did help dramatically
curtail drug abuse. In 1975, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)
announced that while the purity of heroin had declined, the street price was four
times greater. The result was a marked decline in heroin abuse.
Unfortunately, the Carter administration failed to continue the vigorous anti-drug
campaign. In fact, President Carter at one time advocated that marijuana possession
be legalized. It is little wonder that, in the absence of strong moral leadership, by
1979 half of all teenagers were experimenting with the drug. Fortunately, Reagan
was elected at this crucial time, and was succeeded by George Bush Sr.. Both
presidents strongly supported drug interdiction. Between the years of 1979 and
1992, teenage drug abuse reduced by one-half.
The fluctuation of drug abuse statistics in accordance with changing political
leadership is not coincidental. It is a direct reflection of the importance of
presidential guidance on this issue. The Republican presidents that took an
aggressive anti-drug stance helped to drastically ameliorate the problem of
addiction. Under their leadership, public attitudes towards drug use changed. The