Compare And Contrast Crime And TerrorismThis essay Compare And Contrast Crime And Terrorism is available for you on Essays24.com! Search Term Papers, College Essay Examples and Free Essays on Essays24.com - full papers database.
Autor: anton • May 8, 2011 • 1,671 Words (7 Pages) • 957 Views
Compare and Contrast Crime and Terrorism 1
Compare and Contrast Crime and Terrorism
Deneen M Pratt
Axia College of University Of Phoenix
ADJ 215 Criminology
December 9, 2007
Compare and Contrast Crime and Terrorism 2
The United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia were formed in April 1997 as an umbrella
paramilitary federation led by Peasant Self-Defense Forces of Cordoba and Uraba (ACCU) that
sought to consolidate many local and regional paramilitary groups in Colombia, each intending
to protect different local economic, social and political interests by fighting insurgents in their
areas. AUC itself previously estimated that it had authority over most of the paramilitary forces
within Colombia, with the remainder being independent or splinter factions. It is estimated that
It has more than 20,000 militants. The AUC is considered to be a terrorist organization by
multiple countries and organizations, including the United States and the European Union.
The AUC claimed as primary objective to protect its sponsors and its supporters from
insurgents and their activities, including kidnapping, murder and extortion, because the
Colombian state has historically failed to do so. The AUC asserted itself as a regional and
national counter -insurgent force. By having the government begun talks with the groups with
the aim to eventually dismantle the organization and reintegrate its member to society. I would
have a draft law was presented to the public which offered to pardon the members of any illegal
armed group (which would legally include both guerrillas and paramilitaries) that declared a
cease- fired and entered talks with the government , in return for, mainly, their verified
demobilization, concentration within a specific geographic area and the symbolic reparation
of the offenses committed against the victims of their actions.
The motivation of terrorists differ from the motivation of other violent criminal is a terrorist
think of 5 things , the victims, the targets, the intent, the means, and last the motivation .
A terrorist usually specified as civilians or non-combatant the targets the person who are the
Victims of terrorism are merely its direct target. Then you have the Intent: of terrorism is either
Compare and Contrast Crime and Terrorism 3
to intimidate or coerce a civilian population that is, spread fear widely for its own sake: or
coercively influence or manipulate the conduct or policy of one or more government.
The means of terrorism involves violence or the threats of violence against person or
property. And the last on is Motivation is not usually a formal element of a crime, some
Definitions of terrorism specify that its act are "politically" motivated " The term politically" is
used in these contexts as an umbrella for a range of justifications, including ideological,
religious, and nationalistic ones.
The environment in which one is reared determines their perspective on life and shapes the
Principles by which they live. If, let's say you grow up in a country that constantly says the
western world is evil and this is fed to you in schools as well as through the media -- more likely
than not it is what you would believe. It is not difficult comprehending how a distorted view
the world leads people to terrorism . Peer pressure also comes into play in the city where there
are gangs-- and to be considered anybody you must prove yourself to these kinds of people. The
odds are a situation like this will lead to crime.
These people are not born a terrorist or criminal. You have to separate people. A terrorist
is willing to die for their cause being indoctrinated from childhood into thinking a country or
group of people are evil and want only to blast them from the face of the earth. A criminal
enjoys the pleasure of hurting others whether it is killing, stealing, anything dangerous to society.
Some of the most notorious criminal have come from very affluent families. Why did they
become evil, hurtful people? They had criminal minds, only a psychiatrist could answer.
Terrorists come from very poor as well as very affluent families