Read full version essay Kuhn Vs. Popper Vs. Lakatos
Kuhn Vs. Popper Vs. LakatosPrint version essay is available for you! You can search Free Term Papers and College Essay Examples written by students!.
Join Essays24.com and get instant access to Kuhn Vs. Popper Vs. Lakatos and over 30,000 other Papers and Essays
Autor: anton 04 October 2010
Words: 606 | Pages: 3
The articles of "Chance: An African view", "How to convince a reluctant scientist" and "Common sense of science" each involve a philosopher who tried to show how theories and facts in science is discovered. The article of "Chance: An African view"involves the theory of Popper, "How to convince a reluctant scientist" involves the theory of Kuhn and "Common sense of science" involves accumulation of both those theories in Lakatos. They are connected because "Chance: An African view" and "How to convince a reluctant scientist" are opposite of each other and Lakatos is a combination of the two.
The article of "Chance: An African View" involves the theory of Popper. Popper's theory implied that scientists should give up a theory as soon as they encounter any falsifying evidence, immediately replacing it with increasingly 'bold and powerful' new hypotheses. His theory, called falsifiability, is an important concept in the idea that a proposition or theory cannot be scientific if it does not admit the possibility of it being false. Falsifiable does not mean false. For a proposition to be falsifiable, it must be at least in principle possible to make an observation that would show the proposition to be false, even if that observation has not been made. For example, the proposition "All crows are black" would be falsified by observing one white crow. The article talks about how there is no such thing as chance. That there is a cause for everything, thus fact and being able to falsify it, Popper's theory, comes into motion.
"How to convince a reluctant scientist" is connected to "Chance" because it is the opposite of Popper's views. The theory this article is based on is that of Kuhn. Kuhn described science as consisting of periods of normal science in which scientists continue to hold their theories in the face of anomalies, interspersed with periods of great conceptual change. Kuhn'S periods of "normal Science" were when the scientific community all agreed that a theory was true. In the article it talks about how if the scientific community believes in a theory then it is true. That if the whole of scientists agree on a new theory, whether the theory s correct or not, the new theory takes over the old. These two articles are the direct opposite because Popper believes in fact and Kuhn believes in thought.
The third article of"Common sense of science" is about the theory of Lakatos. The article states that " in order to act in a scientific manner, in order to act in a human manner at all, two things are necessary: fact and thought. Science does not consist only of finding the facts; nor is it enough only to think, however rationally. The processes of science are characteristic of human action in that they move by the union of empirical fact and rational thought, in a way which cannot be disentangled. There is in science, as in all our lives, a continuous to and fro of actual discovery, then of thought about the implications of what we have discovered, and so back to the facts for testing and discovery - a step by step of experiment and theory, left, right, left right, for ever." This is a use of Lakatos' theory because it invovles both Kuhn's thought and Popper's fact.
The articles of "Chance: An African view" and "How to convince a reluctant scientist" are complete opposites of each other, both with opposing views. The theories that each are based on contradict each other, but the article "The common sense of science" is the median of the two articles. It holds views that involve both Kuhn's thought and Popper's fact.